1914 6c Washington, red orange, single line watermark
# 429 - 1914 6c Washington, red orange, single line watermark
$1.95 - $750.00
(No reviews yet)
Write a Review
Write a Review
429 - 1914 6c Washington, red orange, single line watermark
| Image | Condition | Price | Qty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mint Plate Block
Usually ships within 30 days.
Usually ships within 30 days.
$ 750.00
|
$ 750.00 |
|
|
|
Mint Stamp(s)
Ships in 1-3 business days.
Ships in 1-3 business days.
$ 99.00
|
$ 99.00 |
|
|
|
Used Single Stamp(s)
Ships in 1-3 business days.
Ships in 1-3 business days.
$ 3.95
|
$ 3.95 |
|
|
|
Mint Stamp(s)
Extra Fine
Ships in 1-3 business days.
Ships in 1-3 business days.
$ 290.00
|
$ 290.00 |
|
|
|
Unused Stamp(s)
small flaws
Ships in 1-3 business days.
Ships in 1-3 business days.
$ 65.00
|
$ 65.00 |
|
|
|
Used Stamp(s)
small flaws
Ships in 1-3 business days.
Ships in 1-3 business days.
Free with 630 Points
$ 1.95
|
$ 1.95 |
|
|
|
Mint Stamp(s)
Very Fine
Ships in 1-3 business days.
Ships in 1-3 business days.
$ 210.00
|
$ 210.00 |
|
Mounts - Click Here
| Mount | Price | Qty |
|---|
U.S. #429
Series of 1914-15 6¢ Washington
Series of 1914-15 6¢ Washington
Issue Date: September 28, 1914
Printed by: Bureau of Engraving and Printing
Method: Flat plate
Watermark: Single line
Perforation: 10
Color: Red orange
Printed by: Bureau of Engraving and Printing
Method: Flat plate
Watermark: Single line
Perforation: 10
Color: Red orange
The Postal Service received complaints, particularly from heavy-user businesses, that sheets perforated 12 were too brittle and fell apart at the slightest touch. To strengthen the sheets, perforating machines were altered to 10 perforations per 2 centimeters, beginning with the 1914 issues.
Perforations Changed from “12” to “10”
When the 1908 series was issued, all stamps were perforated 12 gauge. Soon, both the public and postal workers began complaining that the perforations were too close, and the stamps could not be handled without coming apart. It wasn’t until 1910 that the Post Office Department began taking their complaints seriously. At this time, the Bureau began producing coils on a machine that would automatically wind the stamps into coiled rolls. They soon found the 12 gauge perforations were much too brittle to be used, since the stamps were continually becoming separated in the coiling process.
These events brought about the change to 8 1/2 gauge perforations. However, this produced stamps that were difficult to tear apart, consequently ripping the stamps. Again, the perforations were changed, this time to 10 gauge. While this change was fine for coiled stamps, it was unsuitable for sheets, which had a tendency to tear rather than separate at the perforations. Eventually, it was decided that 11 gauge perforations were suitable for sheets, while 10 gauge perforations were best for coils.
U.S. #429
Series of 1914-15 6¢ Washington
Series of 1914-15 6¢ Washington
Issue Date: September 28, 1914
Printed by: Bureau of Engraving and Printing
Method: Flat plate
Watermark: Single line
Perforation: 10
Color: Red orange
Printed by: Bureau of Engraving and Printing
Method: Flat plate
Watermark: Single line
Perforation: 10
Color: Red orange
The Postal Service received complaints, particularly from heavy-user businesses, that sheets perforated 12 were too brittle and fell apart at the slightest touch. To strengthen the sheets, perforating machines were altered to 10 perforations per 2 centimeters, beginning with the 1914 issues.
Perforations Changed from “12” to “10”
When the 1908 series was issued, all stamps were perforated 12 gauge. Soon, both the public and postal workers began complaining that the perforations were too close, and the stamps could not be handled without coming apart. It wasn’t until 1910 that the Post Office Department began taking their complaints seriously. At this time, the Bureau began producing coils on a machine that would automatically wind the stamps into coiled rolls. They soon found the 12 gauge perforations were much too brittle to be used, since the stamps were continually becoming separated in the coiling process.
These events brought about the change to 8 1/2 gauge perforations. However, this produced stamps that were difficult to tear apart, consequently ripping the stamps. Again, the perforations were changed, this time to 10 gauge. While this change was fine for coiled stamps, it was unsuitable for sheets, which had a tendency to tear rather than separate at the perforations. Eventually, it was decided that 11 gauge perforations were suitable for sheets, while 10 gauge perforations were best for coils.